02-05-2013, 04:37
|
#17
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: The Gunshine State
Posts: 2,499
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bongo Boy
I don't see myself as a 'more is better' guy, and if that Barnes behaves that way rather consistently, I'm impressed. That's your 'advertising photo' quality of expansion, there now.
But still, I was beginning to get the idea from a variety of sources that, for some reason, 10mm was never going to really add much more to the 'repertoire' than 40SW. So, I just took published load data (Accurate, I believe) and ran the numbers for 36 loads of 40SW and 32 loads for 10mm.
The average ft*lbs for 10mm was 50% higher than the average for 40 (604 ft*lbs vs 404 ft*lbs), so I'm all okay now and not worried anymore.  |
I'm confused by your statement. 200ft lbs of KE sounds like a big difference to me.
__________________
Unfortunately, with all the advances in medical science, there still just isnt any cure for "stupid".
|
|
|