So has anybody tested the current situation up there? Suspending the effect of a decision that a law is unconstitutional, doesn't really mean anything. The court decision does not make the law invalid - it recognized that it already was. It was unconstitutional before the decision and it is now, so it creates an interesting situation.
Pigeon chess - "having a pointless debate with somebody utterly ignorant of the subject matter, but standing on a dogmatic position that cannot be moved with any amount of education or logic, but who always proclaims victory."