Originally Posted by BenjiEDF
I think this is a good point. Gun owners have a responsibility to keep their weapons away from their children, to educate everyone in their family on safety etc. This I wholly agree with.
What I do not accept is the notion that if a criminal breaks into your home and steals your property, a gun, then commits a murder with it... that somehow the gun owner was liable
in any way. It is a ridiculous argument.
BTW I love/and agree with your signature Sir
Originally Posted by Jerry
Liability is a legal determination, criminally and civilly.
Where and/or when might the shadow of liability cross over to show a lack of responsibility as a component?
Where was it that penalties surfaced for not reporting stolen firearms within a certain time?