Originally Posted by Cavalry Doc
If life is just a natural progression from simple chemical reactions in nature, why haven't we found it on the moon or mars? It would not be the same, but it would have adapted to it's own environment. We have found life in areas of the world with water temps approaching 750 degrees Fahrenheit. If a planet has to be just the right distance from just the right star, and contain just the right elements, and rotate at just the right rate..... The elements must be in the right place, at a very small scale, in the right amounts, form into the right structures, organelles, and knit together just right..... What results must be able to maintain homeostasis, be in a hospitable environment, must be able to grow, and to replicate itself with an ability to adapt to it's surroundings to increase it's chance of survival.
You wouldn't consider that a remarkable event?
So we have gone from wildly random to just plain ole remarkable? Imagine that. For what ever reason you focused in on life on Earth. I was referencing all of existence with or without life. We don't even get to that point with out certain values in physics being what they are.
What exactly are you even arguing?