Glock Talk - View Single Post

WT · 01-06-2013, 09:27

I'm working off of memory here so you may be right.

I used to collect magazine articles about the USP and thought I saw a rail change mentioned in one of them. I no longer have those articles.

My personal USP dates back to 1998 and I know the series underwent some changes since then.

Regardless, it is a very robust and reliable firearm. I can only remember 1 failure to feed from a magazine with a tired spring.

I really cannot complain about the USP.

01-06-2013, 09:27	#15
WT Senior Member Join Date: Jan 1999 Posts: 705	I'm working off of memory here so you may be right. I used to collect magazine articles about the USP and thought I saw a rail change mentioned in one of them. I no longer have those articles. My personal USP dates back to 1998 and I know the series underwent some changes since then. Regardless, it is a very robust and reliable firearm. I can only remember 1 failure to feed from a magazine with a tired spring. I really cannot complain about the USP.