Originally Posted by M&P15T
I don't disagree with any of the above. Although we must say that we have seen the left compromising/losing on gun-rights in the last 10+ years.
But my question still stands.
Would you trade closing the loop-hole for not having a major loss on anti-gun legislation.
What's the lesser of two evils?
First off there is no loop-hole! The left uses that term in order to say we are getting away
We are not!
Heck the local gun store by me charges $75 to do a FFL transfer. He feels you are cheating him by not buying the gun from him. I have to go to the next town over to pay $20.
When dealing with Democrats, let us remember we are
not dealing with creatures of logic. We are dealing with
creatures of emotion, creatures bristling with prejudices
and motivated by pride and vanity.