Originally Posted by M&P15T
I don't disagree with any of the above. Although we must say that we have seen the left compromising/losing on gun-rights in the last 10+ years.
But my question still stands.
Would you trade closing the loop-hole for not having a major loss on anti-gun legislation.
What's the lesser of two evils?
First off there is no loop-hole! The left uses that term in order to say we are getting away
We are not!
Heck the local gun store by me charges $75 to do a FFL transfer. He feels you are cheating him by not buying the gun from him. I have to go to the next town over to pay $20.