[]; (function() { var gads = document.createElement('script'); gads.async = true; gads.type = 'text/javascript'; var useSSL = 'https:' == document.location.protocol; gads.src = (useSSL ? 'https:' : 'http:') + '//www.googletagservices.com/tag/js/gpt.js'; var node = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; node.parentNode.insertBefore(gads, node); })(); Glock Talk - View Single Post - Guess "Mil Spec" is a moot point now..
View Single Post
Old 12-21-2012, 14:47   #30
Senior Member
chief63's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 289
Originally Posted by Leper View Post
That is actually correct. For those that need range or safe queens it does not matter. For those of us that have these guns to possibly save our lives mil-spec or better matters.

Bushmaster is a low end company. Nothing wrong with owning one but lets not pretend they are anything other than what they are.
Served 30 years and pounded plenty if sand and could care less about mil spec. Works for groupies though.
G42 / Shield / G26 / G19 / G17 / 640 / 66-1 / 686+
chief63 is offline   Reply With Quote