[]; (function() { var gads = document.createElement('script'); gads.async = true; gads.type = 'text/javascript'; var useSSL = 'https:' == document.location.protocol; gads.src = (useSSL ? 'https:' : 'http:') + '//www.googletagservices.com/tag/js/gpt.js'; var node = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; node.parentNode.insertBefore(gads, node); })(); Glock Talk - View Single Post - Guess "Mil Spec" is a moot point now..
View Single Post
Old 12-21-2012, 10:22   #15
Big Bird
NRA Life Member
Big Bird's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 11,288
Originally Posted by Leper View Post
That is actually correct. For those that need range or safe queens it does not matter. For those of us that have these guns to possibly save our lives mil-spec or better matters.

Bushmaster is a low end company. Nothing wrong with owning one but lets not pretend they are anything other than what they are.
Wrongo Leper

Bushmaster was top of the heap back in the good ole' days and they worked fine. Colt wasn't even in the civilian market at the time.
Big Bird,

“Est Nulla Via Invia Virute”
Big Bird is online now   Reply With Quote