Quote:
Originally Posted by Hrsuhd
Did you read the part where I said I get my kids vaccinated?
It was shot specific.
No I asked for information but got "get in line look at the ground do what your told" with the exception of MACE who was cordial and explained a couple things.
I never said the way its being done is wrong I said its not the way I do it and got told I was wrong.
How am I putting my kids at risk.
What is going on right now with the steroid shots is a prime example of why I try to error on the side of caution. Anything canhave a bad production run.
A few years ago for work we were offered the the hep b vaccine . We were all asked if we had gotten the series before and if we were not sure not to get it it could cause problems. I took the series got my titer and was not immune.
and was told I needed to retake the entire series I asked about what I had been told before. I was told oh that changed.Nobody could give my the why or how. They could tell by my tiiter numbers that I probably immune so I decided to not take the chance. again erroring on the side of caution.
My op does not include anything about autism.
Why is spacing out the vaccines wrong. Not the first time Ive asked this no one will answer.
|
I am not going to go in circles with you. See my post #263 for my response to that question. Simple answer is because it means your kids are not immune for longer periods of time or they may not develop sufficient immunity if the schedule is not followed. You seem to ignore posts that you don't like. If you don't want to scroll up and read it, I'll summarize it here: the burden of proof is not on us to defend something that you made up. The burden of proof is on you to justify why you think the CDC schedule is wrong (if you don't agree with the schedule or don't follow then you think it's wrong. There can be no other interpretation). If you can't do it (and you haven't thus far), then you are simply refusing to admit that you just don't have a clue. Spouting feel-good BS about toxins isn't going to cut it. And since the schedule is backed up by peer reviewed research, you are not going to be able to argue against it, and the more you try, the more foolish you look.