Originally Posted by Amsdorf
I've been reading around on the Internet from "experts" that this thing is bound to be a piece of junk, sure to fail, go bad, do something wrong, or be wildly inaccurate, in other words, surely, Ruger's first attempt at a 1911 will be a bad one, or one only half-way well done.
How can I trust the "experts" who predicted my Ruger SR1911 would be so bad?
You must be confused if you are referring to the thread, which was that a Springfield mil-spec was a preferred base gun
for a custom build
by top smiths.
I don't recall anyone saying that the Ruger was a POS.