View Single Post
Old 06-13-2011, 10:56   #6
Black Smoke Trail
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 875
Originally Posted by ChuteTheMall View Post
He meant to use a stun gun on the handcuffed & face-down victim, but drew his pistol instead.


If he wasn't carrying a stun gun, he wouldn't have killed anyone.
That was the euphamistic rationalization given for the attrocity. Even if in fact true, there was absolutely no reason to taser a cuffed subdued man laying on his stomach.

Going with Mehserle's rationalization, he was intending to torture Oscar Grant with his taser. Still not exactly honorable intentions to say the least.

There will always be disagreement over the taser but in my opinion, when abused or used on improper persons, the taser IS a lethal weapon.
NRA Benefactor Life Member, Life Member NSSA, NSCA, NAHC, DAV

Last edited by Black Smoke Trail; 06-13-2011 at 11:02..
Black Smoke Trail is offline   Reply With Quote