[]; (function() { var gads = document.createElement('script'); gads.async = true; gads.type = 'text/javascript'; var useSSL = 'https:' == document.location.protocol; gads.src = (useSSL ? 'https:' : 'http:') + '//www.googletagservices.com/tag/js/gpt.js'; var node = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; node.parentNode.insertBefore(gads, node); })(); Glock Talk - View Single Post - Piston vs Gas uppers
View Single Post
Old 02-10-2011, 16:49   #19
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Midwest
Posts: 3,450
Originally Posted by mstennes View Post
Yes, but it was done as a replacement for the 249, which it will fail at, just me but wouldnt 249's be the answer for SAW's? They have not adopted it to replace their M16's or M4's, as a matter of fact their testing a M16A5 as we speak.
How do they plan on feeding these HKs? I hope theyre not using those dual drum mags.

As a prior 249 gunner I dont think theres a good replacement for it.
mjkeat is offline   Reply With Quote