![]() |
G26 vs. G27 Ballistics
I'm trying to decide between a G26 and G27...
Why I want the G27: 1. I have 2 other .40cal handguns - ammo would work in all 2. Bigger round, more stopping power etc. Why I want the G26: 1. Holds 1 more round than the G27 2. Less recoil, get back on target easier 3. Ammo is much cheaper 4. Easier for Fiancee to shoot if needed I am leaning towards the G26, but am concerned that the 9mm and short barrel = less stopping power, so the G27 might be a better choice. Where can I find ballistics comparing the G26 & G27 vs. normal barrel lengths? |
Look up the tests on a 4" barrel and subtract approximately 30FPS.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Also a G23 40-9mm will fit in the G27 as well and give you a full 4.02" gun. Speer GDHP 9mm 124 +P run 1220 fps 410 E from a 4" barrel. https://www.t-mobilepictures.com/mya...9242011000.jpg |
Glock 26 Velocities
All information is based on 10-shot averages from the 3.46" factory Glock barrel in a Glock 26. Average velocities, extreme spreads, and standard deviations are in ft/sec. An asterisk by the load indicates that it is no longer made. Some Glock 26 shooters may still have some of this ammunition so the data is included. Ammunition Average Velocity Extreme Spread Std. Deviation Aguila 65-gr IQ HP 1517 64 23 Glaser Silver Pre-Frag +P 1514 N/A N/A Winchester USA 115-gr FMJ 1097 87 40 PMP 115-gr FMJ 1046 38 15 Fiocchi 115-gr FMJ 1180 57 21 Federal 115-gr JHP (9BP) 1111 34 13 Triton 115-gr Hi Vel JHP +P* 1280 N/A N/A Hornady 124-gr XTP CQ Tap 1100 38 16 Federal 124-gr Nyclad HP* 1063 N/A N/A Triton 125-gr Hi Vel JHP +P* 1245 N/A N/A Corbon 124-gr XTP +P* 1229 N/A N/A Corbon 125-gr JHP +P 1188 43 17 Winchester 127-gr JHP +P+ RA9TA 1246 33 13 |
I believe there is a website called ballistics by the inch that may be if some help...
|
Quote:
|
------------------------------
Federal 180 gr JHP vel ke pf Eagle 5.1 1005 404 180.9 G 23 962 370 173.2 G 27 913 333 164.4 ------------------------------ Remington 180gr Golden Saber (sample size: 1/ea) vel ke pf Eagle 5.1 n/a n/a n/a G 23 961 369 173.0 G 27 934 349 168.1 ------------------------------ Speer Lawman 180gr TMJ vel ke pf Eagle 5.1 991 392 178.3 G 23 967 374 174.0 G 27 914 334 164.5 ------------------------------ Federal 155gr Hydra-shok vel ke pf Eagle 5.1 1154 458 178.9 G 23 1107 422 171.6 G 27 1077 399 166.9 ------------------------------ Speer Gold Dot 155gr JHP vel ke pf Eagle 5.1 1245 534 193.0 G 23 1210 504 187.6 G 27 1148 454 177.9 *** ------------------------------ Winchester 155gr Silvertip vel ke pf Eagle 5.1 1188 486 184.1 G 23 1131 440 175.3 G 27 1082 403 167.8 ------------------------------ Cor-Bon 135 gr JHP vel ke pf Eagle 5.1 1335 535 180.3 G 23 1258 474 169.8 G 27 1210 439 163.4 |
Quote:
|
what exactly are you trying to stop that you dont think 11 rounds of 9mm wouldnt work....
|
Please, Please don't say a Bear
Quote:
Not another Bear gun thread - LOL! http://www.wildanimalfightclub.com/P...kodiakbear.bmp |
Quote:
|
I love my G26. With the new hollowpoints on the market I don't feel underpowered with the 9mm. +P+ ballistics for penetration and expansion are right in line with all the other calibers. My preference is to have the most rounds availabe to me.
|
FBI Protocol Test Results
9x19 Win Ranger +P+ |115@1320, 21.7 mv, 444 E|BR 9.6", 0.53", 2.11cu|CL 10.2", 0.65", 3.37cu|avg 2.74, 3.89 re, 0.70
9x19 - caliber Win Ranger +P+ - the name of the load 115@1320 - bullet mass in grains @ muzzle velocity 21.7 mv - bullet momentum in lb*fps 444 E - muzzle energy in ftlbs BR - what follows is the data for bare gelatin 9.6" inches of penetration 0.53", final expanded diameter of bullet 2.11 cu, approximation of wound volume. (this does not take into account the expansion profile as a function of depth, but it should be roughly proportionate to actual wound volume) CL - what follows is the data for clothed gelatin same fields as the bare gelatin, as defined above avg 2.74 - Average wound volume, clothed and bare gelatin 3.89 re - Free Recoil Energy, assuming a 1.88 lb pistol 0.70 - Average would volume per unit Free Recoil Energy. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 9x19 Win Ranger Talon|147@ 864, 18.1 mv, 243 E|BR 13.8", 0.61", 4.03cu|CL 15.2", 0.59", 4.17cu|avg 4.10, 2.72 re, 1.51 9x19 Win Ranger Talon|147@1017, 21.4 mv, 337 E|BR 13.8", 0.66", 4.70cu|CL 15.5", 0.65", 5.14cu|avg 4.92, 3.77 re, 1.31 9x19 Win Ranger +P+ |115@1320, 21.7 mv, 444 E|BR 9.6", 0.53", 2.11cu|CL 10.2", 0.65", 3.37cu|avg 2.74, 3.89 re, 0.70 9x19 3-D |115@1178, 19.4 mv, 354 E|BR 11.6", 0.54", 2.66cu|CL 13.9", 0.48", 2.52cu|avg 2.59, 3.10 re, 0.84 9x19 Rem +P+ |115@1221, 20.1 mv, 380 E|BR 10.8", 0.63", 3.37cu|CL 10.9", 0.62", 3.29cu|avg 3.33, 3.33 re, 1.00 9x19 CCI/Speer GD |115@1259, 20.7 mv, 404 E|BR 12.3", 0.67", 4.35cu|CL 22.1", 0.40", 2.78cu|avg 3.43, 3.54 re, 0.97 9x19 CCI/Speer GD |115@1197, 19.7 mv, 365 E|BR 12.8", 0.67", 4.51cu|CL 22.6", 0.44", 3.44cu|avg 3.78, 3.20 re, 1.18 9x19 CorBon +P |115@1317, 21.6 mv, 442 E|BR 8.9", 0.52", 1.90cu|CL 10.2", 0.61", 2.98cu|avg 2.44, 3.87 re, 0.63 9x19 Fed +P |115@1237, 20.3 mv, 390 E|BR 11.2", 0.53", 2.48cu|CL 10.6", 0.62", 3.20cu|avg 2.84, 3.41 re, 0.83 9x19 Fed Silvertip |115@1091, 17.9 mv, 304 E|BR 10.1", 0.63", 3.13cu|CL 11.8", 0.58", 3.12cu|avg 3.13, 2.66 re, 1.18 9x19 CCI/Speer GD +P |124@1223, 21.7 mv, 411 E|BR 13.4", 0.68", 4.87cu|CL 20.2", 0.53", 4.47cu|avg 4.64, 3.88 re, 1.20 9x19 CCI/Speer GD |124@1116, 19.8 mv, 342 E|BR 11.8", 0.69", 4.41cu|CL 22.0", 0.36", 2.24cu|avg 3.22, 3.23 re, 1.00 9x19 Rem |124@1109, 19.6 mv, 338 E|BR 12.4", 0.60", 3.52cu|CL 13.7", 0.57", 3.50cu|avg 3.51, 3.19 re, 1.10 9x19 PMC/Eldorado SF |124@1118, 19.8 mv, 344 E|BR 10.7", 0.63", 3.32cu|CL 20.1", 0.41", 2.65cu|avg 2.98, 3.24 re, 0.92 9x19 CorBon XTP |124@1123, 19.9 mv, 347 E|BR 13.9", 0.56", 3.44cu|CL 18.3", 0.46", 3.04cu|avg 3.24, 3.27 re, 0.99 9x19 Fed HydraShok |147@ 935, 19.6 mv, 285 E|BR 13.6", 0.60", 3.85cu|CL 16.1", 0.52", 3.41cu|avg 3.63, 3.19 re, 1.14 9x19 Win Black Talon |147@ 946, 19.9 mv, 292 E|BR 14.8", 0.60", 4.20cu|CL 16.4", 0.61", 4.78cu|avg 4.49, 3.26 re, 1.38 9x19 Rem |147@ 987, 20.7 mv, 318 E|BR 18.1", 0.51", 3.71cu|CL 15.9", 0.59", 4.36cu|avg 4.03, 3.55 re, 1.14 9x19 Hornady XTP |147@ 918, 19.3 mv, 275 E|BR 22.1", 0.44", 3.36cu|CL 20.5", 0.46", 3.41cu|avg 3.18, 3.07 re, 1.04 9x19 Fed HydraShok |147@ 995, 20.9 mv, 323 E|BR 21.4", 0.37", 2.30cu|CL 15.6", 0.60", 4.41cu|avg 3.28, 3.61 re, 0.91 9x19 Win Silvertip |147@ 902, 18.9 mv, 265 E|BR 14.6", 0.53", 3.22cu|CL 18.1", 0.47", 3.14cu|avg 3.18, 2.97 re, 1.07 9x19 CCI/Speer GD+P |124@1155, 20.5 mv, 367 E|BR 13.2", 0.62", 3.99cu|CL 16.1", 0.53", 3.55cu|avg 3.77, 3.46 re, 1.09 9x19 CCI/Speer GD |124@1068, 18.9 mv, 314 E|BR 12.6", 0.59", 3.44cu|CL 17.5", 0.51", 3.57cu|avg 3.51, 2.96 re, 1.19 9x19 CCI/Speer GD |147@ 924, 19.4 mv, 278 E|BR 14.8", 0.57", 3.78cu|CL 14.7", 0.55", 3.49cu|avg 3.63, 3.11 re, 1.17 9x19 Win Ranger PG |124@1015, 18.0 mv, 283 E|BR 12.5", 0.65", 4.15cu|CL 14.0", 0.61", 4.09cu|avg 4.12, 2.67 re, 1.54 9x19 Win Ranger T |147@1016, 21.3 mv, 337 E|BR 13.8", 0.66", 4.72cu|CL 15.7", 0.00", 0.00cu|avg 2.36, 3.76 re, 0.63 357SIG CCI/Speer GD |125@1372, 24.5 mv, 522 E|BR 16.1", 0.60", 4.54cu|CL 19.1", 0.54", 4.36cu|avg 4.45, 4.96 re, 0.90 40SW Win Ranger Talon|180@1000, 25.7 mv, 399 E|BR 13.6", 0.68", 4.92cu|CL 13.5", 0.68", 4.90cu|avg 4.91, 5.47 re, 0.90 40SW CCI/Speer GD |155@1176, 26.0 mv, 475 E|BR 10.7", 0.84", 5.93cu|CL 18.1", 0.57", 4.62cu|avg 5.27, 5.61 re, 0.94 40SW CCI/Speer GD |155@1186, 26.3 mv, 483 E|BR 10.7", 0.84", 5.93cu|CL 17.7", 0.58", 4.68cu|avg 5.30, 5.70 re, 0.93 40SW Hornady XTP |155@1194, 26.4 mv, 490 E|BR 14.5", 0.65", 4.81cu|CL 18.1", 0.55", 4.30cu|avg 4.56, 5.78 re, 0.79 40SW Win Silvertip |155@1199, 26.5 mv, 494 E|BR 12.2", 0.69", 4.54cu|CL 13.2", 0.71", 5.21cu|avg 4.87, 5.83 re, 0.84 40SW Fed Hi-Shok |155@1167, 25.8 mv, 468 E|BR 13.8", 0.61", 4.02cu|CL 19.5", 0.51", 3.98cu|avg 4.00, 5.52 re, 0.72 40SW CCI/Speer GD |165@1076, 25.4 mv, 424 E|BR 13.1", 0.65", 4.33cu|CL 15.8", 0.60", 4.47cu|avg 4.40, 5.32 re, 0.83 40SW Fed HydraShok |165@1007, 23.7 mv, 371 E|BR 13.8", 0.62", 4.18cu|CL 15.2", 0.64", 4.87cu|avg 4.53, 4.66 re, 0.97 40SW Rem |165@1031, 24.3 mv, 389 E|BR 12.5", 0.67", 4.41cu|CL 16.3", 0.61", 4.76cu|avg 4.59, 4.88 re, 0.94 40SW Fed HydeaShok |165@ 931, 21.9 mv, 317 E|BR 15.8", 0.58", 4.19cu|CL 21.1", 0.43", 3.06cu|avg 3.55, 3.98 re, 0.89 40SW Rem G.S. |165@ 952, 22.4 mv, 332 E|BR 13.1", 0.64", 4.21cu|CL 20.0", 0.53", 4.41cu|avg 4.31, 4.16 re, 1.04 40SW Rem G.S. |165@1022, 24.1 mv, 382 E|BR 14.8", 0.65", 4.89cu|CL 14.3", 0.66", 4.91cu|avg 4.90, 4.80 re, 1.02 40SW Fed HydraShok |165@ 943, 22.2 mv, 325 E|BR 18.2", 0.63", 5.69cu|CL 19.4", 0.56", 4.77cu|avg 5.23, 4.08 re, 1.28 40SW Win Ranger T. |180@ 947, 24.4 mv, 358 E|BR 13.8", 0.69", 5.14cu|CL 13.7", 0.70", 5.25cu|avg 5.20, 4.90 re, 1.06 40SW CCI/Speer GD |180@ 982, 25.3 mv, 385 E|BR 14.5", 0.59", 3.96cu|CL 17.6", 0.60", 4.96cu|avg 4.46, 5.27 re, 0.85 40SW Rem G.S. |180@ 931, 23.9 mv, 346 E|BR 16.8", 0.69", 6.28cu|CL 16.9", 0.63", 5.28cu|avg 5.78, 4.74 re, 1.22 40SW Rem G.S. |180@ 945, 24.3 mv, 356 E|BR 16.9", 0.64", 5.44cu|CL 21.0", 0.43", 3.05cu|avg 4.17, 4.88 re, 0.85 40SW Rem G.S. |180@ 893, 23.0 mv, 318 E|BR 15.7", 0.65", 5.19cu|CL 21.1", 0.51", 4.32cu|avg 4.64, 4.36 re, 1.06 40SW CCI/Speer GD |180@ 958, 24.6 mv, 366 E|BR 14.6", 0.60", 4.13cu|CL 17.1", 0.62", 5.16cu|avg 4.65, 5.02 re, 0.93 40SW Rem G.S. |180@ 954, 24.5 mv, 363 E|BR 14.8", 0.66", 5.06cu|CL 14.8", 0.67", 5.20cu|avg 5.13, 4.98 re, 1.03 40SW Win B.T. |180@ 917, 23.6 mv, 336 E|BR 13.5", 0.69", 5.05cu|CL 14.4", 0.70", 5.54cu|avg 5.29, 4.60 re, 1.15 40SW Hornady XTP |180@ 929, 23.9 mv, 345 E|BR 13.9", 0.64", 4.49cu|CL 18.4", 0.55", 4.38cu|avg 4.44, 4.72 re, 0.94 40SW Fed HydraShok |180@ 969, 24.9 mv, 375 E|BR 14.2", 0.69", 5.29cu|CL 19.8", 0.59", 5.41cu|avg 5.35, 5.13 re, 1.04 40SW Fed Hi-Shok |180@ 960, 24.7 mv, 368 E|BR 14.8", 0.66", 5.05cu|CL 24.0", 0.47", 4.16cu|avg 4.26, 5.04 re, 0.85 40SW Win Ranger SXT |180@ 905, 23.3 mv, 327 E|BR 11.2", 0.70", 4.31cu|CL 13.0", 0.64", 4.18cu|avg 4.25, 4.48 re, 0.95 40SW Win Ranger PG |165@1109, 26.1 mv, 450 E|BR 13.1", 0.73", 5.48cu|CL 14.5", 0.72", 5.90cu|avg 5.69, 5.65 re, 1.01 40SW Win Ranger T |180@ 943, 24.2 mv, 355 E|BR 13.6", 0.68", 4.94cu|CL 14.6", 0.70", 5.62cu|avg 5.28, 4.86 re, 1.09 |
the .40 cal round might travel slower than a 9mm, but when you are shooting at something, whatever it is isn't going to be able to move fast enough to get out of the way. you can easily increase the capacity of the 27 with +1 extension. i have pearce +1 grips on all my 27 mags. keeps the frame manageable but gives you the extra round...good fit for medium sized hands. i've always been biased to the .40 cal - solid ballistics and great stopping power. i find that round easy to control, even with a subcompact weapon and hold it as my "standard". you and your fiancee can shoot well with a 27 with practice. seems like a no brainer to me...especially since you can get a conversion barrel for the 27 and make it a 9mm, like previously stated.
|
Anyone who has been on this forum for awhile has seen a lot more "I had a 27 but..." posts than "I had a 26 but..." ones.
|
I went with the 26, I have a few 23s & others to handle the 40s.
|
I ended up buying both. With good self defense loads I don't really feel much of a difference in recoil. With Wally World practice ammo the 9mm (G26) is a soft shooter but the .40 (G27) still feels close to the recoil of the self defense loads. While I like the G27, I would recommend the G26 over it even though my other Glocks are not in 9mm.
Really you should try to go shoot both with self defense ammo and bulk ammo and make your choice from your experience. |
The first firearm I was issued was a H&K .40 USP Compact. It was a decent gun. When I had to buy a duty weapon for my new job, I stuck with .40 and got a Glock 23. I shot well with it, but after 200+ rounds, the web of my hand was red and sore.
Waaaa *sniff, sniff*, I know. I went to the range and tried a Glock 19 in 9mm. WOW. Big difference. I was firing quickly and putting rounds right where I wanted them. So I bought the Glock 19 and a 26 to carry OD/BUG. I LOVE my 26. I can shoot the 26 as well as the 19 even at distance. Some people say there isn't a big difference in recoil between 9mm and .40. Eh, it's not big enough to affect a good shooter. However, .40 IS more snappy. To me, if I wanted something with "stopping power" (stupid term!), I'd go with .45. I'm very pleased with 9mm in +p as my duty ammo. Go with the Glock 26. You won't be disappointed. Just get good ammo to carry in it. Don't buy some cheap crap. Not a fan of the .40 round at all anymore. I was when I knew little about firearms. |
Quote:
|
ES13Raven,
I would suggest buying a G27 and then later on down the road pick up a Lone Wolf conversion barrel to 9mm, plus a few G26 mags, basically you’ll have both. I’m looking at doing the same after I return from Afghanistan in one month (hoping to get an OD green G27 to match my G22 in OD). Good luck! The link for Lone Wolf listed below: http://www.lonewolfdist.com/Products.aspx?CAT=241 |
Quote:
|
Pachmayr Tactical Grip Glove Slip-On Grip Sleeve Glock 26, 27, 28, 29, 30,
Quote:
Pachmayr Tactical Grip Glove Slip-On Grip Sleeve Glock 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 33, 39 Rubber Black - $9.99 http://www.midwayusa.com/product/376...9-rubber-black http://media.midwayusa.com/productim...376/376822.jpg |
I bought a 26 and later added a 23 for a little variety and added capacity. Both conceal beautifully in Nick Mathews #1 and Gary Brommeland's Max Con V.
There's no doubting that .40 has a little harder kick so the slightly larger form factor is helpful. 13+1 .40 180 HST is pretty comforting too. |
Quote:
The 9mm will stay on target easier. But I have come away feeling confident the .40 hits "harder". |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:30. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©2011, Glock Talk, All Rights Reserved.