So, in 2012, are you voting for barry romney, or mitt soetoro?
For instance, take the "choice" that Americans have in this year's election cycle when it comes to deciding on who will be our next POTUS. We are told that we have a choice between two different political worldviews. Do we really make a choice, or is it more so a false dichotomy perpetuated under the guise and myth of us choosing our President?
In 2012, we have been given a "choice" between barry soetoror, and mitt romney, or so we think it is a choice. In reality, it will merely be a choice by Americans to have puppet -A-, or puppet -B-, with both puppets doing the will of the new world order elitists. Or, as someone I highly respect put it, "Regardless of who we vote for, we will have death by an "elected" socialist dictatorship, or death by an "elected" socialist dictatorship. Hey dude, you choose!"
Some may say, "Wait, you're being too cynical. The choices we have are not the same at all. After all, the challenger romney is a conservative, and the incumbent soetoro is a left wing liberal." If this is your actual belief during this year's election cycle, please consider changing your worldview over political matters.
This year the two primary issues, which by the way there are always two or three, mass media mandated issues, will be related to "jobs creation" and "affordable healthcare." But wait, those of you with a memory that last more than two years will quickly note that the last election cycle was also about "jobs creation" and "affordable healthcare."
Didn't the guy "we elected" in 2008 solve these problems? No, and he wasn't supposed to as these are merely election cycle recalcitrant issues that keep you and I as the voters focused on the wrong topic.
As far as healthcare is concerned, hillary-care of the 90's morphed into romney-care of the 2000's, which took hold as obama-care of the 2009-2012. You see, this so called "obama-care," is simply romney-care, which was derived of and from hillary care from back in the 1990's. Regardless of whatever politcal figure is promoting this as a good idea for Americans, it is simply the same old fascist healthcare system that steals money from the greater populous to line the pockets of the insurance companies.
This year the State of Massachusetts will be touted as working model of the health care system written by the insurance companies. However, in actual fact, the only reason Massachusetts was able to fiscally endure this draconian, yet Fabianist form of socialistic healthcare was due to the fact that the vast majority of the State's populous are not
participants of any common welfare system.
Matter of fact, the State of Massachusetts maintains a median household income level of over $64,000 per year as well as holding an average individual level of over $30,000 per year. If you were the head of an insurance company trying to establish great looking numbers for an insurance policy, then Massachusetts would definitely be one the better places to reveal such a plan.
In reality, Massachusetts is simply a great place to Beta-test the same old, make that VERY old, healthcare reform bill that has been in existence since the 1990's. Back then it was known as hillary-care, this year, due to our nation's election cycle, the two health care systems, which are essentially the exact same thing yet again, will be given a left-right paradigm in order to fool voters into to thinking they have actually have a choice between two differing programs.
So I ask again, "Are you are voting for barry romney, or mitt soetoro?"
If you select choice -A-, you will get -B-, and if you select -B-, you will get -A-.
As for me, I'm writing in Ron Paul. Just my $0.02, ymmv
Posted 11-26-2012 at 22:17 by WilliamDahl
Posted 01-24-2013 at 02:41 by Peace Warrior
Updated 01-24-2013 at 02:42 by Peace Warrior